VE3OIJ -
I recently acquired an Icom ID-1 in order to play with D-Star. I chose the ID-1 because, quite frankly, I have enough 2m / 70 cm radios around the house: 3 handhelds, 2 mobiles, and 2 base radios. I just didn't need another radio for that band. I had head a lot about the wonders of D-Star, but I was skeptical. I wanted to give it a try to see if it lived up to the hype and a good way to do that seemed to be on the 23 cm band - I expected a general lack of interference, and the added benefit of being able to take a stab at 128 kbps data was a plus.
Recently, I was at the HAM-EX in Brampton, and RadioWorld had a great deal on the ID-1, so I picked it up. I'll probably review the radio in a later post, but suffice it to say that setting up for D-Star is not for the timid, especially given the quality of translation in an Icom manual. There is, however, a fair bit of good literature out there written by amateurs to guide you through that process.
I set up my radio, and after waiting for registration, was apparently good to go. Unfortunately, despite receiving the local repeater at full scale on my antenna at 8 feet, I was unable to reliably access it, even with 10 watts. I moved the antenna up to 20 feet and was still unable to access it. It was suggested I needed a higher gain antenna.
Now, I am going to kvetch here for a moment. I am using about 50 feet of RG/8U coaxial cable to feed an MFJ-1532N. If 10 watts is coming out of my radio, which it seems to be, I should lose 4.2 dB and let's run with 1 dB loss between the connectors at each end (which is probably overstating it). The antenna is supposed to have 11.7 dB of gain (presumably dBi, so let's drop 2.15 for dBd which is more realistic), for a net gain of 3.85 dBd, all-in. That's an ERP of about 24 watts. Evidently, that's not good enough. I can only conjecture that the building penetration of 23 cm is not as effective as I was led to believe. A fluke of positioning (see below) means I have to drill through two buildings. I must admit, I am more than a little bit surprised that there is so much path loss as a result of this, but it's the only explanation that makes sense barring the repeater's antenna system being inadequate, and since I believe they use the same MFJ-1532N...
It is an excuse for a project. My plan, therefore, is to construct a 20 element yagi for the radio. I use Yagi Calculator by John Drew (VK5DJ) to run the calculations and produce a design. My intention is to use old arrow shafts for the reflector and directors (I am an archer), and measuring tape for the folded dipole driver.
Running the appropriate dimensions of materials into the program, this is the result:
(click to see full size)
I have measured the arrow shafts, and I will be using a length of seasoned 1x2 for the boom. It requires 3 arrow shafts to make all 19 parasitic elements. One advantage to having long arms - long arrows for antenna elements.
This should give me 4 to 6 more dB of gain (bringing my ERP up to somewhere between 61 and 97 watts. Hopefully that is enough to blast through whatever the obstructions might be.
As I was writing this, it occurred to me that I might be able to trace LOS on Google Earth. Sure enough, a perusal of the Line of Sight between my house and the repeater site is somewhat revealing. There are two obstacles that, coincidentally block my line of sight. If I lived just a few houses away on either side of my QTH, I'd not have to deal with one or both:
(click to see full-size)
Indeed, it seems that by a coincidence of location, the office buildings for Canada Revenue Agency, and Natural Resources (yes, I put Energy, Mines, and Resources in the image, that's the old name) happen to line up nicely between me and the repeater. Just a few houses to the west and I wouldn't have to deal with either of them. A few houses to the east and I could miss one of them. Evidently then, I have path loss to overcome.
Hey, my wife's uncle has a house about 200m to the west... I wonder if he'd like an antenna on the roof :)